Posts
2342
Following
118
Followers
641
software tinkerer and aspiring rationalist. transhumanist and alterhuman

I try to be very careful about CWing things. sometimes I make mistakes but I want to make my posts as safe to read as possible

I sometimes post NSFW/kinky/lewd things behind CWs. this should go without saying but if you're a minor please do not interact with anything lewd/NSFW that I post

I have very limited energy and am very shy so it might take me a long time to reply to messages sometimes, or I might not be able to reply at all. this is kind of an "output only" account for the most part, but I'm hopeful that I can change that over time

I sometimes use curly braces to {clearly show where a grammatical phrase begins and ends}, like that. you can think of them like parenthesis in code or math, except they operate on grammar instead
Edited 2 months ago

huge shoutout to CurseForge for keeping every version of every WoW addon and letting you sort by which WoW version they’re compatible with. AFAICT there is Absolutely No Reason why this would be helpful for a retail WoW player but it is a lifesaver for private server players like me

0
0
5

I’ve been getting back into my private WoW server lately (I do this about once per year for 2 weeks and then get bored again lol) and it’s reminding me why I always delete all of my characters and start from scratch: WoW characters are extremely fucking complicated and there’s no way to take notes that are stored on the server about how to play them or what I was doing with them, or really anything about them at all

which character was my auction house character? why is my character in this zone in particular? what items are stored in which character’s bank and why? how do I make sense of the enormous complexity of their abilities? etc. it’s way easier to just start from scratch than figure out wtf was going on with each one

so yeah I have about 10 characters and I’m going to delete all of them and start from scratch. I feel like the average WoW player would be screaming at me right now lol but genuinely, it’s this or not play the game at all

2
0
3
repeated
"this sucks. I am X years old and I should know how to do <seemingly basic thing> by now, I'm a failure!"

no little one, we are not born knowing these things and we do not evolve automatically like pokemon. someone has to guide and teach you or it takes *forever* to learn on your own.

you are not a failure. someone failed you.
0
2
1
repeated

historic drystone sheep dyke

Here’s a three month old screenshot of a tweet that tickled me

1
2
1
Edited 2 months ago

dystopian fiction doesn’t work because no matter how much you confront the average person with the flaws in our current system, they still won’t understand that alternative systems are possible or what those would look like, so they either descend into doomerism about it or learn how to turn off their empathy for others

we need fiction with a proactive message - like fiction that juxtaposes two societies, one better than the other - or fiction that shows how to fight for a better world and how/why that works. or hell how about you just show people a society that they would prefer to live in and show them how it’s possible to create that

but you can’t just be like “capitalism bad” because everybody already knows that homeless people and starvation exist

2
0
5
Edited 2 months ago

my high school classes may not have taught me anything of value whatsoever but they did give me a lifelong deep-seated hatred for the entire field of math, the English language, symbolism, poetry, the entire field of literary analysis, anything considered “high art”, and anything involving American history

1
0
2
Edited 2 months ago
shitpost
Show content

sporngus (fig a)

vs.

sprongus (fig b)

know the difference

1
0
1
repeated
Edited 2 months ago

I'm playing "Doom 2" for the first time after not touching the first game in roughly 8 years, and MAN does playing this game make me appreciate "Duke Nukem 3D" even more. I can't tell you how many times I just wanted to be able to jump or to look up and down; things we take for granted in gaming these days. It's almost crazy to think HOW MUCH Duke changed FPSs, adding these now "simple" plus also adding more precise aiming vs in "Doom" where you kinda just aim in the general area of an enemy and bullets just find their way to nearby enemies. Hail to the king baby.

1
1
1
repeated
Edited 2 months ago
selfie, no face, fake bullets as a belt
Show content
10
2
1
Edited 2 months ago

I am once again watching Jenny Nicholson’s four hour review of a Star Wars hotel that I would never want to visit and that no longer exists

1
0
1
lewd, cursed
Show content

I am in awe at the fact that there is a double-digit amount of porn on Rule34 of Sebulba fucking Jar-Jar Binks

0
0
2

there should be Fedi instances hosted on port 3. just imagine:

catgirl.cafe:3

2
4
18
repeated

Luck Goddess 🌒🌕🌘 (They/She)

I see :3

0
3
2
Edited 2 months ago

some random youtube video: “how fast can you softlock every Animal Crossing game?”

me, who has never cared and will never care about Animal Crossing: omg I can’t wait to find out

2
4
10

okay I’m going to try learning Clojure one more time but if I can’t get into it this time then I’m going to give up on Lisps forever and move on to either learning an old version of C or F#

it’s frustrating because the parenthesis syntax and the “everything is an expression” philosophy was kinda growing on me but like, wow these languages are from the 1960’s and it really feels like it too

1
0
5
repeated

Hey cuties, I set up a Ko-fi! 😇

If you like my photos and ever feel like supporting me, whether it’s for coffee or prettier heels, here’s the link:

https://ko-fi.com/mioontje

0
2
1
repeated
kink (muzzles)
Show content

important technology update! neofox_aww

1
3
2
repeated
Happy spooky month everyone akko_yay
0
2
1

I was starting to get the feeling that Fennel’s functional style was at odds with the imperative Lua that it was acting as a thin wrapper on top of. so I’ve been learning Scheme lately instead, because Lisps are still interesting to me but I was starting to think that maybe Fennel was giving me a bad impression of what a Lisp can be

unfortunately Scheme has problems that I would consider much worse than Fennel, and those are:

a lot of its functions have strange legacy behavior and there are often multiple ways to do the same things, some of which have footguns that you have to memorize. for example just look at how complicated a simple equality check is in this language

its “documentation” is also its standard, which is written in very hard-to-understand academic-speak

since Scheme is a standard for a language and not a language per se, its ecosystem is fragmented between a bunch of different interpreters and compilers which have subtly different behavior from each other - some (but not all) of which include extra libraries on top of the standard library. so I really wonder how portable Scheme code is even between these different interpreters/compilers, let alone between different operating systems

the Scheme interpreter that I’m using, called CHICKEN, has a really bad REPL that can’t even handle me using the arrow keys. I was trying to find a better REPL but searching for “Scheme REPL” and “Scheme CHICKEN REPL” gives no useful results

I wonder if there’s a modern #Lisp that doesn’t have these problems, and also ideally has good tooling (like a good LSP or whatever the Lisp equivalent of an LSP is). I’ve deliberately avoided learning Common Lisp because I get the feeling that it’s going to have even more chaotic legacy behavior, footguns, etc. which I find very ugly in a programming language

4
0
1
Edited 2 months ago

I think that pacman‘s command-line syntax is incredibly arcane, difficult to document or explain, and makes it way too easy to bork your entire install by accidentally typing one wrong letter

but I will give it one thing: every single time I have to type sudo apt update && sudo apt dist-upgrade && sudo apt autoremove it makes me wish I could just type sudo pacman -Syu. it’s very very terse and fast to type

2
0
3
Show older