@dragonfi yess omg I remember seeing a variation on this image! I love how it explains
I don’t think the YT-1930 would be able to do this? since the cockpit is in the middle of the mandibles and the visibility would be very very impaired by having cargo in the front. although I guess you could navigate based on sensors instead. but it does have mandibles so then the question becomes, what are the mandibles for?
maybe it really is meant to be able to haul cargo containers too, and the cockpit is in the center as a tradeoff so that you can see both sides instead of just one
then again, if you think too much about any aspect of a Star Wars ship, the logic starts to fall apart. like, there is no explanation for S-foils that makes sense IMO - especially the ARC-170’s S-foil configuration
I'm definitely not getting fun ideas about soft robotics after watching this >///<
@mioontje also I tried to reply to this post a few days ago but it didn’t go through. cryptid.cafe runs on a tiny VPS and it chokes on posts sometimes lol
but I wanted to say that I was obsessed with this pic for a while. I couldn’t get it out of my head. it’s definitely one of the hottest things I’ve seen on Fedi. like the outfit, the pose, your body - everything is so good 💙
I fucking love YT series freighters. I want to drift in space for 4 months in a YT-1930 with my entire polycule as we all just relax and talk and play video games and cuddle
(the YT-1930 can hold 4 months’ worth of food, water, and other supplies)
Picture my hand on your throat, my voice in your ear, and nothing in your control~
"it's too important to CW" and other phrases that constitute begging to be spritzed in the face with a spray bottle
If there's one theme in at least the transfem community I'm loosely a part of, it's the line between good and bad dehumanization.
Like, if you're around someone cool you might a doll or a robot or a puppy, but you're still gonna react negatively if someone dehumanizes you in a malicious or a dismissive or patronizing way. Sometimes you straight up have two gender identities, one for your friends and one for society at large. (It/its to my friends, she/her to my enemies)
It can lead to some interesting collisions, like when someone who publicly self-identify as a robot have a discussion bout the implicit dehumanization of "doll" as mainstream queer slang. Like, navigating this distinction is not an issue most of the time, it's not actually a contradiction, but it does make your head spin a little when the two modes rub up against each other.
for those of you with really bad and persistent heartburn like me, here’s a tip that I just discovered:
try sucking on an antacid like it’s a hard candy instead of just chewing it and swallowing it. that way it’s neutralizing the acid and washing it away every time you swallow. when I do this I get relief for the entire time that I’m sucking on it, and it takes a while for it to start burning again afterward
a while ago I posted a criticism of the word “idempotent” and this is what I was trying to say. in order to understand this word you have to either:
obviously googling a single word isn’t a problem on its own, but it becomes a problem when you’re reading an article that uses one fancy academic word after another and you can’t even get a clue about what the words are supposed to mean without - again - knowing Latin
now imagine if instead of “idempotent” we said “change-once”. as in, a change-once operator. it still doesn’t get the exact meaning across but it’s drastically better than “idempotent”, and it’s much easier to memorize too!
obviously what I’m implicitly saying is that academic words should be in English by default, instead of Latin or Greek, and I don’t like that (I wish we were speaking Esperanto or an even better conlang than that) but I think it’s the pragmatic choice because it’s the most-spoken language in the world
and speaking of writing in Latin so that only other nobles can understand, isn’t it interesting how academic language almost exclusively uses Greek and Latin roots? I wouldn’t be surprised at all if speaking in plain/vernacular English was shamed as “unprofessional” or “uneducated” in academic circles, and I think it comes back to this same mechanism for excluding the working class
anyway yeah I suspect that this “secret language” thing is a widespread problem in all branches of academia - not just math
this is also how I feel about math notation because math notation is:
it reminds me of how Medieval nobles would speak and write in Latin so that they could only be understood by other nobles, as a form of social exclusion. because no one else had access to the leisure time and money for tutoring costs that it would take to learn a skill like that
so yeah kas’s hot take of the day is that math notation is a classist secret language and knowledge of math is deliberately inaccessible to the working class