" @kirakira@furry.engineer i’m genuinely happier doing the second btw. i hate working for a company so much
working for a company with a pretty consistent 40-hour work week: ughhhh this is so draining i feel like i’m working my life away. i don’t have any energy even on my days off
working for yourself: if i keep skipping breakfast and dinner and work 9 days a week i can probably make enough money for a plane ticket to see my friends next month
does the reader consider “person” or any applicable noun referencing the reader’s being to be recursively defined, ie. (excuse the bad EBNF)
<person> ::= <person> | <person> <person>
or does the collective / system require a specifically defined plural form?
<people> ::= <person> | <person> <person>
to clarify: this is more aimed at preference / ideals, not necessarily just what is acceptable, but any interpretation is fine
wait that means i’d need to document it with real words in a way comprehensible to others 
or like that scene with the bike with the giant propeller attached from kiki’s delivery service
“Billionaires will leave if you tax them”:
1. No they won’t
2. They leave even when you don’t tax them
3. Things get better for most people when they leave
4. They say this so you won’t tax them
this is me btw i would’ve absolutely died in a fatal balloon accident
interestingly wishful thinking mixed with large spinning blades is exactly how the fizzy lifting room works. given that it was written in the 70s, i could imagine carbon monoxide was involved too
was willy wonka a NIH developer
i imagine not invented here developers in the 1910s would’ve come up to me like “check out this flying machine i made, it’s powered by carbon monoxide and wishful thinking”
why do things the easy way when i could remake everything from scratch and quit halfway through
i made a dialogue system for the bevy game i’m working on, i wonder if i should publish it somewhere. i think yarn spinner has a bevy port but 