Posts
2785
Following
119
Followers
684
software tinkerer and aspiring rationalist. transhumanist and alterhuman

I try to be very careful about CWing things. sometimes I make mistakes but I want to make my posts as safe to read as possible

I sometimes post NSFW/kinky/lewd things behind CWs. this should go without saying but if you're a minor please do not interact with anything lewd/NSFW that I post

I have very limited energy and am very shy so it might take me a long time to reply to messages sometimes, or I might not be able to reply at all. this is kind of an "output only" account for the most part, but I'm hopeful that I can change that over time

I sometimes use curly braces to {clearly show where a grammatical phrase begins and ends}, like that. you can think of them like parenthesis in code or math, except they operate on grammar instead

@SeaDonut omg did something happen to Risk of Rain?

1
0
0
repeated
Edited 5 months ago

Fascinating blog that reveals a worrying practice: https://jviide.iki.fi/http-redirects.
Many sites exposing a service with an HTTP API can be accessed on HTTP. Sure, the server will redirect to HTTPS, but the client has already sent credentials over the HTTP connection, basically sending password-equivalent data in clear text! Consequences are easy to guess. The blog lists dozens of servers doing that, some small, several quite big!

1
1
1
repeated

@calcifer @hjhornbeck I don't think the switch to PQC is premature, no, but nor do I think (based on 20 years of experience in the field!) that we're anywhere near practical quantum attacks.

I don't think QC is a hoax or just hype, but also the thing to count is the number of logical qubits that are of sufficient quality to implement Shor's algorithm or similar hidden subgroup attacks. For most intents and purposes, that number has been stuck at "one" for years.

1
1
1

some examples of roguelites that (IMO) understand how to be good roguelites and give you lots of interesting options:

  • Binding of Isaac (and its sequel)
  • BPM: Bullets Per Minute
  • Rogue Adventure
  • Slice and Dice
  • Probably Noita from what I’ve seen, but I haven’t played it
3
0
3
Edited 4 months ago

not sure if this will be an unpopular opinion but:

the fun of a roguelike/roguelite comes from being given a weird, randomized toolset and trying to improvise around that. part of the fun is also trying to build off of that toolset to create an overpowered combination of abilities

in some runs you get completely overpowered without even trying, and with others your luck is so bad that you can barely accomplish anything. but the more you play and start to see patterns in how to become powerful, the better you get at using the strangest things to your advantage. in order for this to work, items need to be able to strongly synergize: they need to interact with each other in intricate ways that affect your playstyle a lot

and the problem that I have with modern roguelites is that they just don’t seem to remember this? with the exception of Balatro which completely nails it. but like try creating an overpowered combo in Hades 1 or Cult of the Lamb or Severed Steel’s Rogue Steel mode. you basically just can’t. all of the upgrades are super bland and don’t really have any potential for interesting synergies

I feel like a lot of indie games are being shoehorned into the roguelite mold, instead of being created from the ground up in order to be an interesting roguelite

(this post inspired by me replaying a game with a lot of potential but which fell flat in just enough areas to kinda ruin its own gameplay: Teleglitch. one of its biggest mistakes was that it Should Not Have Been A Roguelite)

2
3
13
repeated

holy fuck

https://github.com/element-hq/element-web/issues/30760

they're finally changing the message sound

after 8 years

1
1
1
repeated

Dear website designers,

Please stop disabling text selection (highlight) on your websites.

First, it isn't exactly rocket science to bypass;

second, there are people who highlight the paragraphs they are reading.

More of this and I will copy and paste them somewhere else out of spite.

9
7
3
repeated

@gwynnion As an example by way of agreement, meme culture is culture. I don't get why literary genre seems to think it's cringe-y to reference or incorporate specific memes, but making references to specific things that happened on 1980s TV shows isn't.

1
1
1
repeated

Octavia Con Amore pink_moon_and_stars Succubard's Library

Edited 4 months ago
:boosts_ok: racism, fedi, specifically for people who want to or are currently fighting racism
Show content

I need to write a proper post about this at some point, but for now, here's the short version:

If you're purportedly fighting racism on fedi, purportedly trying to make it a more diverse space, purportedly trying to make it a more welcoming space to people that aren't white, etc, stop assuming people that don't have their race plastered in all caps on their profile are white, k? shiba_angry (*especially* if you're a POC yourself)

Because you know what that is? White-washing, an example of the very racism we're trying to fight, and something that makes a space seem less diverse than it actually is zerotwo_shrug

The fact that it's used against POC to discredit what we have to say is just the cherry on top (and often even a wonderful example of lateral violence cat_facepalm )

p.s. Deflecting criticism from poc by insinuating they're not actually poc, that they're actually white, is included in this as well. Some people use this as their go-to defense, painting everyone who they don't agree with as 'white' or 'not poc enough'.

5
2
1

I bet Fennel code (especially my Fennel code) looks extremely cursed to experienced Lisp devs lol

0
0
0

my brain is completely fried after doing a DailyProgrammer in Fennel @_@

https://pastebin.com/i1cbWYXD

I think I’m getting the hang of Lisp’s weirdness though – a little bit. Fennel is definitely the perfect gateway into Lisp for me:

  • it’s easy to write imperative code
  • it’s very small and simple
  • under the surface it’s basically just Lua, and I know Lua decently well

I’m using fennel-ls as my LSP and it’s… workable. it definitely helps a lot more than having no LSP

1
0
1

I think my ideal language, though, would probably be Lua with its quirks ironed out (0-indexed tables, !=, variables are local by default, etc.) and Rust’s macro system added on top

0
0
3

one of the reasons why I’m interested in Lisps is that in theory they don’t need to have this problem. they could have an extremely simplistic Lua-like core language with a minimal amount of ideas needed to conceptualize how the language works, and then have a modular standard library on top of that for extending it and making it really nice to use and full of modern features like classes, list comprehensions, etc.

and then when newer, better ideas are invented, those modular systems could be swapped out for new ones, while still keeping the core language compatible with The Old Ways

obviously Lua can kinda do this already, but the advantage that Lisp-like languages have is that they have macros, letting them do all kinds of weird shit

so anyway that’s why I’m so interested in Fennel - because it seems like the best of both worlds: the core language is as simple and easy-to-learn as Lua (because it basically is Lua) but on top of that, just enough Lisp has been added to allow macros to be created, theoretically letting it become just as expressive and nice-to-use as Python (minus the Lisp syntax)

1
0
4

I really really wish that programming languages could just change their entire design with each major version whenever it’s possible to make things more elegant - instead of adding features on top and supporting bad legacy decisions

but… that’s how you get the Python 2 → Python 3 transition problem. so I guess at a certain point, elegance has to take a back seat to practicality

I still don’t like it though lol

1
1
4

the only thing worse than supporting legacy software, is not supporting legacy software

1
0
5
repeated

new pronoun notation: appending a number to be used as a weight for random pronoun selection

it/its:10 she/her:5 they/them:1

10/16 it/its, 5/16 she/her, 1/16 they/them

maybe include 0 as a "i won't get mad at you for using this but avoid it"

it/its in a she/her:0 way

0
6
2
repeated

Congratulations to all, on the release of Unicode 17.0. The "distorted face" is now officially standardized as \u1FAEA

14
13
4
Show older