Conversation
Edited 23 days ago

I’m going to nail this Steam review to the doors of every AAA studio like a modern Martin Luther

1
5
28

from now on I’m going to exclusively rate games based on how long it takes for me to get to the core gameplay /hj

2
0
3

HOLE: 10 seconds
Clone Hero: 5 minutes of configuration
Metroid Prime: a 2-minute cutscene, or ~45 minutes to get to Talon IV
Witcher 3: I don’t know I gave up after an hour

1
0
1

@konstruct hehe - it’s called a tone tag and this specific one means ā€œhalf-jokingā€. you can read more about tone tags here

1
0
1

@kasdeya I knew about tone tags but didn't know about hj! We should use more informative tags that allow to guess easily. Thanks! I should use those more often

2
0
1

@konstruct I would love if tone tags were more like /HalfJoking or maybe (/half joking)! I think that’s way clearer. I feel similarly about Fedi’s CW abbreviations like ā€œuspolā€ or ā€œmh-ā€œ - like it’s much more helpful to type the whole thing out like ā€œUS politicsā€ or ā€œmental health negativeā€

now that you bring it up, maybe I’ll start writing tone tags as (/half joking) or (/joking) or etc. though I might need to think about the syntax a little more first

2
0
1

@kasdeya yeah it took me a moment to guess that "mh~" means mixed mental health.

0
0
1

newly unjobbed yokai!

Edited 23 days ago

@kasdeya @konstruct this makes me think of a video i like about the /hj tone indicator (i have very similar problems that the person in the video is expressing). it discusses the possibly intentionally-ambiguous nature of the indicator and how at its best, it’s unhelpful and at its worst, it’s worse than just not including it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bYXy1jT3m8

1
1
1

@rowan @konstruct this was a really interesting and eye-opening watch tbh. I had never had any trouble interpreting the meaning of /hj so it never occurred to me that others might have trouble with it

when I wrote:

from now on I’m going to exclusively rate games based on how long it takes for me to get to the core gameplay /hj

my intent with /hj was to communicate ā€œit would be funny if I literally believed that this should be the only criterion for judging any game’s value, but this is also a criterion that I genuinely value for gamesā€. so I wonder if a better indicator might have been ā€œ(exaggerating)ā€ (because I’m exaggerating my own feelings to be funny) or maybe just ā€œ(joking)ā€ because I was joking, even though I sincerely believe something similar to my exaggerated statement in the post

if I used ā€œ(exaggerating)ā€, though, I feel like that might imply that what I really mean is ā€œfrom now on I’m going to consider this criterion when evaluating gamesā€ - but the truth is that this is already one of my criteria. my criteria haven’t recently changed, and this has been something that I’ve considered when evaluating games for a long time. so maybe ā€œ(joking)ā€ is clearer

idk - what do you think about those two options?

1
0
1

@kasdeya @konstruct oh, thank you for clarifying! šŸ’œ that was a good example to use because i can’t parse that statement without your explanation neofox_blep

as far as (joking) versus (exaggerating) – i actually don’t have as clear an distinction as that video does when trying to interpret /s vs /j. i’ve seen so many instances where someone will say something ridiculous (but plausible) and then walk it back with ā€œi was joking.ā€ whether or not they were joking or fielding opinions on an extreme statement is something different, but it seems like ā€œa jokeā€ can be something which is non-serious in delivery but serious in intent, serious in delivery but non-serious in intent, or non-serious in delivery and non-serious in intent.

if i had to guess what each one of those means, it would be

  • unserious delivery, serious intent: exaggeration
  • serious delivery, unserious intent: hyperbole, sarcasm
  • unserious delivery, unserious intent: joke, but also sarcasm?

ā€œrowan do you seriously not know what a joke isā€ no neofox_floof

but i think of the options you’ve given, i like (exaggeration) because it’s the most unambiguous to me šŸ’œ

1
0
1

@rowan that is really good to know - thank you! šŸ’™ and to be honest the distinction between /j and /s has always been pretty fuzzy to me too

0
0
1

@konstruct @kasdeya In case it helps, for ā€œall that slang I’m too embarrassed to ask aboutā€ Urban Dictionary has never failed me.

0
0
1