Conversation

I feel like a pretty decent metric for the user-friendliness of a Linux distro would be:

  • can you install the distro from scratch and play a youtube video without ever opening a terminal?
  • after 6 months, can you update all of the software and still play a youtube video without ever opening a terminal?

at least one of these tests would fail if any of my most common issues with Linux happened:

  • display problems
  • video card driver problems
  • wifi problems
  • audio problems
  • problems during installation
  • DE problems
  • updates breaking things
4
2
11

@kasdeya The "six month test" is a good one to be honest. It's great if things work out of the box, but if it withstands half a year of software, updates and general crud too that's even better!

0
0
1

@kasdeya ive been what 10 months or so on Mint so it passed.

Aside from having GPU freezing if hardware video was enabled in browser, but this GPU was a bit weird on Windows too.

1
0
1

@kasdeya Unfortunately it always seems like at least one of these is a compromise for the other. At best we can minimize each of these by having a little bit of them all.

0
0
1
taking this way to serious
Show content

@kasdeya is it a binary metric? like, either u can play a video or you can't?

what about antix 32bit? you don't need to open a terminal to watch videos but it's made specifically for PCs so slow they struggle with youtube.

what if a distro shows you what it's doing under the hood by automatically opening the terminal, putting in commands and closing if again when you hit a graphical button?

what if you're made to select your OS in grub? that count as a terminal?

0
0
0

@foxysen oohh that’s amazing! I definitely want to try Mint once I have the energy to install it on my laptop - or once Arch annoys me enough that I install it anyway lol

0
0
2