I feel like a pretty decent metric for the user-friendliness of a Linux distro would be:
at least one of these tests would fail if any of my most common issues with Linux happened:
@kasdeya The "six month test" is a good one to be honest. It's great if things work out of the box, but if it withstands half a year of software, updates and general crud too that's even better!
@kasdeya ive been what 10 months or so on Mint so it passed.
Aside from having GPU freezing if hardware video was enabled in browser, but this GPU was a bit weird on Windows too.
@kasdeya Unfortunately it always seems like at least one of these is a compromise for the other. At best we can minimize each of these by having a little bit of them all.
@kasdeya is it a binary metric? like, either u can play a video or you can't?
what about antix 32bit? you don't need to open a terminal to watch videos but it's made specifically for PCs so slow they struggle with youtube.
what if a distro shows you what it's doing under the hood by automatically opening the terminal, putting in commands and closing if again when you hit a graphical button?
what if you're made to select your OS in grub? that count as a terminal?