oh, you’ve been doing your own research? I’d love to have a look at the P-values. you’ve made sure that your hypothesis is falsifiable right? and I’m sure you have a very solid and nuanced understanding of the data that would be expected if the null hypothesis is true, right?

and clearly you must be highly knowledgeable and qualified in the field, to be overturning decades of scientific studies - presumably through in-depth meta-analyses of the relevant research

oh - you’re not? your criticism must be much more fundamental, then. you must know a lot about epistemology, the scientific method, and what constitutes “justified belief”… right?